Comparing Benefits
There are many suppliers promoting their favourite answer to rising energy prices. Will these offerings really do what they claim to do?
More importantly, how can you make sense of all these competing claims?
The following table assumes that the particular option has been installed properly by professionals, and only takes into account the impact on personal comfort (liveability of your home) and energy savings.
Do not use this information to compare the relative merits of different types of cooling, for example, because when your home's balance is optimal, additional heating and cooling are less likely to be required.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Air Leakage Balance
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
| |
 |
 |
 |
 |
- Low cost to implement
- Instant improvement in personal comfort
- Fast payback on energy savings
- Rapid return on investment
- No structural changes
- Non-invasive work usually completed same day
- Allergen reduction
- No ongoing maintenance required
- Lower ingress of pollutants and allergens
- Reduced ingress of insects
- No taxpayer subsidies required
- When done first, will reduce or eliminate the need for and cost of heating and cooling methods
- Enables smaller, cheaper and more efficient heating and cooling systems
- Only undertaken by qualified and licensed personnel
- Only approved materials used in rectification work
- Official certification provided
|
|
Leak Plugging
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
| |
 |
 |
 |
 |
- Cheap to perform
- Consumables available in discount stores
- Can be done by handyman
|
- Potentially dangerous - over-sealing introduces health hazards
- Actual leaks likely to be missed
- Air quality likely to suffer
- Certification not possible
- Dangerous if carried out unscientifically
- Improper sealing can lead to persistent moulds and even rot
|
Ceiling Insulation
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
| |
 |
 |
 |
 |
- Proven method of limiting heat loss through ceiling
- Relatively low cost to install
|
- Marginal value to home balance
|
Solar Panels
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
| |
 |
 |
 |
 |
- Capital cost is subsidised
- While the subsidy lasts your energy costs will be lower
|
- Relies on unreliable taxpayer subsidies
- Limited life expectancy - eventually need replacement
- Unattractive
- Efficiency diminishes over time
- Has no effect on gas energy consumption
- You may forfeit off-peak tariff savings
- No benefit to indoor liveability
- May require structural changes to your home
- Effectiveness depends on weather
- Does nothing to improve home balance
- Can be expensive to install
|
Solar Heating
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
| |
 |
 |
 |
 |
- Capital cost may be subsidised
- While the subsidy lasts energy costs will be lower
- Effective way of reducing hot water costs
|
- Relies on uncertain taxpayer subsidies
- Unattractive
- No benefit to indoor liveability
- May require structural changes to your home
- Effectiveness depends on weather
- Does nothing to improve air balance
- Can be expensive to install
- Requires ongoing maintenance
|
Switch Energy Supplier
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
| |
 |
 |
 |
 |
- Potentially lower tariff
- Potentially incentives to change
|
- The supplier you've just left might drop their prices, too
- Does nothing to improve home balance
|
Weather Seals
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
| |
 |
 |
 |
 |
- Low cost
- Stops obvious drafts
- Can be done by a handyman
|
- Does very little to improve home balance
- Overdone, may cause unhealthy air quality
|
Double Glazing
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
| |
 |
 |
 |
 |
- Reduces heat loss through glazed areas
- Reduces noise pollution
|
- Does nothing to improve home balance
- Potentially expensive to install
- Extremely long payback period
- Limits the warming benefit of sunlight during winter
|
Evaporative Cooling
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
| |
 |
 |
 |
 |
- Cheaper to operate than air conditioning
- Improves summer comfort
|
- Does nothing to improve home balance
- Useless in winter
- If your home's air balance is incorrect, will add to your electricity bills
- High consumption of water
- Potentially expensive to install
- Requires ongoing maintenance
|
Air Conditioner
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
| |
 |
 |
 |
 |
- Cools in summer
- Warms in winter
|
- Expensive to install
- Expensive to run
- Requires maintenance
|
Underfloor Heating
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
| |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
- Does nothing to improve home balance
- Useless in summer
- Expensive to run
- Expensive to install
|
Hydronic Heating
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
| |
 |
 |
 |
 |
- Improves winter comfort
- Efficient form of heating
|
- Can detract from the decor of your home
- Can intrude into available floor space
- Potentially expensive to install
- Useless in summer
- Requires ongoing maintenance
|
Low Energy Light Globes
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
| |
 |
 |
 |
 |
- Minimal effect on energy consumption
|
- Does nothing to improve home balance
- Light quality is compromised, possibly necessitating supplementary lighting
- Expensive to install without taxpayer subsidies
|